Why doesn't Ash have a narration?
In the game "ICEY", players will experience an adventure full of meta-narrative and rebellious spirit. However, unlike other games, Ashe's narration is not always present, and may even be "ignored" or "revolted" by players in some cases. This design triggered widespread discussion among players: Why does Ashe have no narration? This article will analyze this phenomenon from three perspectives: game design, narrative techniques, and player experience, and attaches hot topic data from the entire network in the past 10 days as a reference.
1. Game Design and the Role of Narration
The narrator of "Ashe" is not a guide in the traditional sense, but an "authority" who tries to control the player's behavior. The game makes players aware of their own choices through the absence or interference of the narrator. The following is the discussion hotness data about "Game Narration Design" in the past 10 days:
topic | Amount of discussions (articles) | heat index |
---|---|---|
The role of game narration | 12,500 | 8.7 |
"Ashe" narration controversy | 9,800 | 7.9 |
Metanarrative game design | 6,200 | 6.5 |
It can be seen from the data that players pay a lot of attention to the narrative design. In particular, the "rebellious" setting of the narrator in "Ashe" has triggered a lot of discussion.
2. Narrative Technique: Breaking the Fourth Wall
"Ashe" realizes a unique narrative technique - breaking the fourth wall - through the "disappearance" or "misdirection" of the narrator. Players are no longer passive spectators accepting the story, but become participants or even resisters of the story. The following is the popular content about "breaking the fourth wall" in the past 10 days:
keywords | Search volume (times) | Related games |
---|---|---|
Break the fourth wall | 45,000 | "Ashe" "The Stanley Parable" |
meta narrative game | 32,000 | "Undertale" "Beginner's Guide" |
This design allows players to feel the existence of "free will" and also strengthens the irony of the game.
3. Player experience: choice and resistance
The absence or intrusion of a narrator essentially provides "choice" to the player. Players can follow the narrator's guidance, or they can resist or even "kill" the narrator. The following is the evaluation data of players on "Ashe" in the past 10 days:
Review type | Proportion | high frequency words |
---|---|---|
positive review | 68% | "Free", "subversive" and "interesting" |
Negative review | twenty two% | "Confusion" "Confusion" |
Neutral evaluation | 10% | "Unique" "Experimental" |
Judging from the data, most players have a positive attitude towards the design of "Ashe" and believe that the absence of narration enhances the interactivity and depth of the game.
4. Summary: Why doesn’t Ashe have a narration?
The "disappearance" or "rebellion" of the narrator in "Ashe" is not a design flaw, but one of the core experiences of the game. It does this in the following ways:
1.Give players choice: The absence of a narrator makes players aware that they can rebel against the "established script."
2.Reinforce meta-narrative: By breaking the fourth wall, let players think about the boundary between games and reality.
3.satire on authority: The narrator's controlling nature and misdirection satirize the "absolutely correct" narrators in traditional games.
Hot data in the past 10 days shows that this design still has high discussion value, and also proves the innovation of "Ashe" in game narrative.
check the details
check the details